There has been what
police term a ‘major incident’ in the English Midlands city of Nottingham. Two
people were found dead in the street and, later, a third. Three others were hospitalised.
Whenever this sort of event occurs, the initial reports must be examined
forensically. In this case, early media coverage told us that the police
Counter Terrorism Unit were involved. There is a mention of understanding the ‘ideology’
behind the attack. Eye-witnesses say the man driving the van – who is 31 and
under arrest – had dark skin. Finally, the police have urged the public to ‘be
cautious’. Usually, they tell the public not to ‘jump to conclusions’, and this
means the same thing and refers to social media.
All of these
indicators suggest that the attacker was a Muslim. This will worry those
shadowy figures in government whose job it is to ensure that the ‘optics’ surrounding
an event like this always serve to protect brand Islam, one of the UK
government’s top priorities. I have watched the various media advances with
interest. The city has had sections of it cordoned off, and this cordon seems
to be expanding. Two men at a commercial premises have been arrested. There
will be a press conference by the Nottinghamshire police later today, which
will again have to be looked at forensically for key words and phrases.
If I am wrong, I will
eat humble pie with a side order of crow, but it is a pound to a pinch of snuff
that, if the suspect were a white Englishman, his identity would have been made
known straight away. Twitter is, apparently, alive with Leftist crayon wielders
calling the attack a ‘white supremacist’ act. Whenever a serious incident takes
place, there is a hard rump of Leftists imploring heaven – their version of
heaven – that it is a white guy.
If it is a Muslim,
the next phase of distraction will begin, as the suspect will be labelled a ‘lone
wolf’ with ‘mental health issues’. Now, you could argue that adherence to the
Koran and various other primitive jujus indicates a level of problematic mental
health in itself, but the use of these phrases misunderstands the fundamental
nature of Islamic terrorism.
In the days when Al
Qa’eda were the biggest gang in town, we Western news consumer were sold the idea
of some James Bond villain’s shadowy organization. But ‘Al Qa’eda’ translates
from the Arabic as ‘the method’, ‘the way of doing things’, ‘the protocol’, and
‘base camp’. There is no undersea island, just the knowledge that there will be
a steady stream of one-off attacks carried out in adherence to a theologico-social
set of commands and extending to all Muslims. Muslim attacks can happen at any
time and in the leafiest of English counties, which, along with the visible
effects in cordoning off streets, has the additional bonus in terms of
anarcho-tyranny by keeping people scared of their own streets, and painfully
aware of the unspoken (because you aren’t permitted to) danger of violent
Islam.
As I say, if I am
wrong I will find a hat and eat it. But I am betting this driver is a
Mussulman.
No comments:
Post a Comment