This column was originally published at Counter Currents.
UNION JACKAL
FEBRUARY 2023
Out, damn’d Scot!
So, it’s fare thee well to
dime-store Lady Macbeth, Nicola Sturgeon. The Scottish premier, and the woman
Nigel Farage called the most unpleasant politician he had ever met, quit after
an uproar, which is what journalists reading tweets and sensing a story is
called just at the moment. It seems that promoting legislation that means
16-year-old kids – never the most emotionally stable class of humans – could
decide to swap genders as easily as they switch phone providers didn’t go down
too well with the average Scot. The Scottish premier – they are called ‘First
Ministers’ in Jockland - resigned, opening the way for a leadership challenge which
includes an even more odious human being, Humza Yusaf, a Muslim who is on record as
disliking his white colleagues based on their skin color.
Sturgeon was not the only
pushy broad with a connection with England to quit as national premier in
February. New Zealand’s toothy dominatrix Jacinda Ardern also threw in the
towel before the towel was thrown at her. She is the woman who told her people
that the government “should be the only source of truth”. You should have
thought that, sweetheart, not said it.
Hopefully, and keeping it in
the Commonwealth, the third pretty maid all in a row to go will be foppish Canadian
charlatan Justin Trudeau. He recently commissioned a rigged enquiry about the
treatment meted out to Canadian truckers who dared question the new globalist
order. Oh, and not just the truckers, but people who gave money to their cause,
some of whom had
their bank accounts frozen. I have liked the Canadians I have met
here, but their voting for this mountebank twice does make you question their
cognitive abilities. Perhaps Pierre Poilievre, leader of the Canadian
opposition, might restore an unwoke Canada to some kind of respect on the world
stage before Canadians start wearing dresses, or hinting that they might like
to, as in Monty
Python’s famous Lumberjack Song.
It would be nice to see
Trudeau retire into private life, the better to ponder whether his dad was
Fidel Castro or Mick Jagger.
15-minute inner-city blues
You have to hand it to the
globalists, they are not short of ideas designed to curtail the freedom of
ordinary people. The latest wheeze of the World Economic Forum is about to be
road-tested in one of the world’s most famous university cities, Oxford. The
concept has become known as the “15-minute city”, the idea being that the city
is divided into sections and everyone should have all the resources they need
within a 15-minute radius. You can only make a specified number of car journeys
outside your patch a year before a system of fines kicks in. It sounds quite reasonable,
particularly as people have become lazier. In fact, the idea resembles a series
of expanded prison exercise yards.
The over-arching
governmental reason for this herding operation, planned for people and not
cattle, is of course the green agenda, flown in like a new stage-set when the
Covid show finished its run. Governments know that you have to keep the
pressure on the little people. The idea is that car journeys will be curtailed,
thus helping to save the apparently beleaguered planet. Actually, I am equipped
to be objective about this as I don’t drive, never have, and find cars
dangerous, noisy and dirty, as well as turning some people into maniacs. But I
do appreciate that, in a country as spacious as the USA, and with a railway
system that needs a John Galt in charge rather than a Pete Buttigieg, cars are
a necessary evil where their diminution might not matter so much in Britain. It
is possible to cycle from John O’Groats at the northern tip of Scotland to
Land’s End in Cornwall – the traditional longest distance traversable in the UK
– in 14 days. Ten if you are super-fit. It’s a very small island.
But, of course,
environmental concern is a classic distraction to hide an ulterior motive, and
talk of “climate lockdowns” has led to protests and demonstrations in Oxford
and elsewhere in the UK. There is a certain sense of the worm turning just at
the moment in Britain.
The green side of the
argument features the usual hysteria about conspiracy theorists who disagree
with their creeping totalitarianism, and a good example is here.
The MSM is onboard, as they are with any version of the “current thing”, but it
may well be that the natives are becoming restless.
Find the lady
The case of Nicola Bulley is
particularly distressing, and not just on a human level. Ms. Bulley went missing
at the end of January while walking her dog by the River Wyre in Lancashire in
the north of England. For the next three weeks, the police dragged the river, a
private team of dredging experts was brought in, and even locals went out with
torches looking for the missing woman. Nothing. Until a dog-walker found a body
by a stretch of river the police and the experts claimed to have scoured. Last
Sunday, the body was confirmed as that of Ms. Bulley.
I am not sure which is more
upsetting, the sad death of Nicola Bulley, the incompetence of the police, or
the callous tone of some of the journalism about the case, some of which seemed
more concerned with social media abuse which might be aimed at those connected
with investigations.
Also, an unnecessary amount
of attention was paid to Ms. Bulley’s personal problems. Allegedly, Nicola
suffered from depression and had problems with alcohol brought on her by her
menopause. Mental health issues and alcoholism are two grievous afflictions
that have nothing like the level of governmental, social service, and media
support and approval that drag-queen story hour in primary schools has.
Perhaps the most touching
thing about the whole sad affair is that the
public raised £10,000 to cover the cost of Nicola’s funeral. This
is the only ray of light in what is otherwise a tragedy reflecting on many
areas of incompetence and callousness in British society.
The black wives of Henry
VIII
The blackening of British
history continues apace. Now, strictly speaking this is an American story, but
as Union Jackal I decree that I am able to cover it both because it concerns
one of Britain’s most famous kings, and also because America was a former
British colony we let you have because you were more trouble than you were
worth. No free-born Englishman would throw tea into water that wasn’t boiling
hot. You deserve Biden and everything else just for that insult.
Six – which
refers to the famous six wives of Henry VIII - is a musical off Broadway
and heading for the ‘burbs, last
spotted in Columbus, Ohio. I’m surprised they haven’t had to
change the name of the town, incidentally, as white liberals get into a bit of
a tizzy about Christopher Columbus, what with the audacity he showed by discovering
much of the New World and allowing it to become at least part-way civilized.
Funny how Columbus doesn’t seem to bother the people who actually live in those
countries, in one of which I am sitting writing this, and whose national
currency is the Colón. This is not a medical term in Spanish, but rather the Latin
American name for Columbus. But I digress.
Apart from being described by
the doughty Columbus Dispatch as taking “a fresh, feminist look at
British history”, a description one can only shake one’s head at in despair before
passing on, the
photo of the cast shows three of Henry’s half-dozen wives as
clearly black, and two more of dusky hue. This is becoming a constant with
British history as portrayed dramatically, which is increasingly resembling one
long minstrel show. I have written on the subject here.
Henry VIII no more had a
black spouse than he wrote Greensleeves, another popular myth about
Britain’s stoutest king. He did have an eye for the ladies, however, and
generally had his way with them. And if you can cut your wife’s head off, or at
least sub-contract the work out to an expert, I imagine you don’t get nagged
all that often. And you have to admit that he did impress the girls. “Wow,
she’s hot. How can I make her notice me? I know, I’ll close all the monasteries”.
Chicks love all that.
Sir Oswald Knowsley
Knowsley is an area of
Liverpool, and possibly one of the most Left-wing areas of what is probably Britain’s
most Left-wing city. Why, then, are some of its residents being labelled “far
Right”? Gentle reader, they committed the new cardinal sin of being concerned
about immigration.
The use of the term
“far-Right” has followed exactly the same trajectory Orwell describes in Politics
and the English Language with reference to the word “fascism”. It doesn’t
mean anything over and above what the person using it doesn’t like. The new
“far Right” in Knowsley seem to object to Muslim illegal immigrants
propositioning their young daughters on the latter’s way home from school.
This Channel 4 report is
representative of the instantaneous smearing of anyone going against the
pro-immigrant narrative. It is irresponsible and shoddy journalism as it
ignores two key elements of the so-called “Knowsley immigration riots”.
Firstly, a video taken
by a young girl of her being propositioned by a cross-channel migrant. It
starts at about 52 seconds. Locals have said that this is far from an isolated
incident. Secondly, the riot and the escalation of violence and subsequent were
almost certainly exacerbated by what seems to be a British chapter of Antifa. This
is explained – although the term “Antifa” is not used – in the Merseyside
police report on the incident. An “anti-fascist” gathering
had been arranged on social media at the Suites Hotel, Knowsley - the scene of
the protest – and that is what turned it into a riot. From the report;
“[A] number of people, who
were not part of the original protest group, turned up, and it clear they were
only interested in trouble through violence and intimidation…”
So, there we have it.
Concerned parents who turn up are deemed to be fascists because a group of
anti-fascists turned up and caused trouble.
A mad world, my masters.
The Union Jackal.
No comments:
Post a Comment